One concern about the [book] is that I'm young and new to investing, and because you're a persuasive writer and I'm not well-versed in finance you could be selling a lemon. I'm not looking for a guru to blindly follow. Outside of your reading list, which I am looking into, especially those books I've seen elsewhere, would you be willing to offer up a contrarian perspective or publication -- one that may be well viewed by some but that contradicts your work?
Jan 4, 2007
RESPONSE:
Thanks for the thoughtful note. I think the fact that you recognize that a persuasive author could lead you astray puts you in a very good position NOT to be led astray (an insight that many investors don't have). One point I make in the book is that you should never take one person's word for it, and my hope is that pointing readers toward others who have arrived at similar conclusions will provide enough evidence and support that one can eventually embrace the ideas with confidence.
As for the counter-arguments, bookstores, newspapers, financial TV, and much of Wall Street are full of those who argue that, if only you use this system, or study this technique, or follow this guru, etc., you'll beat the market and leave your less-ambitious friends in the dust. (A good example of such a book, one I was a devoted follower of in my early days, is How To Make Money in Stocks, by William Oneil. Another great book--and a great read--is Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, from 1923. As you read it, just remember that the super-trader, Jesse Livermore, eventually shot himself.)
I think such success is possible--some people do beat the market. After 15 years in and out of the business, though, I think the odds of it are so low that the vast majority of investors who try will fail (and, in the process, end up wasting money and time.)
What finally persuaded me of this were the academic studies showing the percentage of professionals who fail to beat the market (3 out of 4 over short terms and 9 out of 10 over long terms). Contrary to the intimations of the popular financial press, professional investors are not stupid or incompetent. On the contrary...they are extremely competent. It's just that there are so many of them that they are the market. And if this is the best the professionals can do, then the average part-timer is facing long odds indeed (I refer to some of these studies in the book, but many are available online as well.)
Thanks again for the thoughtful note. Hope you enjoy the book.